МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ВЛИЯНИЯ ИНСТИТУТОВ НА ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ РОСТ РЕГИОНОВ
Аннотация
В работе описана методология исследования влияния институтов на экономический рост регионов. Модели экономической динамики, которые учитывают институциональные показатели регионов, позволяют исследовать влияние институциональных изменений на динамику экономического роста регионов. Наша методология исследования основана на динамической модели, которая учитывает проблемы эндогенности, так как мы используем панельный векторный авторегрессионный подход наряду с панельными функциями импульсного отклика.
Литература
1. Bekaert, G., Harvey, C.R., Lundblad, C. Does fi nancial liberalization spur growth? Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 3–55.
2. Bowles S. Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution. New York, Russell Sage foundation; Princeton: Princeton university press, 2006. 584 p.
3. Butkiewicz J. L., Yanikkaya H. Institutional quality and economic growth: Maintenance of the rule of law or democratic institutions, or both? Economic Modelling, 2006, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 648–661.
4. Chamberlain G. Panel Data. Handbook of Econometrics ed. by Z. Griliches, M. Intrilligator. Vol. II. Amsterdam, 1983. Pp. 1247–1318.
5. Dias J., Tebaldi E. Institutions, human capital, and growth: The institutional mechanism. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2012, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 300–312.
6. Dumitrescu E.-I., Hurlin C. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 2012, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1450–1460.
7. Gagliardi, F. Institutions and economic change: A critical survey of the new institutional approaches and empirical evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics, 2008, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 416–443.
8. Glaeser E. L., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 2004, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 271–303.
9. Greif A. Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: evidence on the Maghribi traders. Journal of Economic History, 1989, vol. 49, № 4, pp. 857–882.
10. Greif A. Historical and comparative institutional analysis. American Economic Review, 1998, vol. 88, № 2, pp. 80–84.
11. Holtz-Eakin D., Newey W., Rosen H. S. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel. Econometrica, 1988, vol. 56, № 6, pp. 1371–1395.
12. Hood M. V., Kidd Q., Morris I. L. Two sides of the same coin? Employing Granger causality tests in a time series cross-section framework. Political Analysis. — 2008, vol. 16, pp. 324–344.
13. Hurwicz L. Institutions as families of game form. Japanese Economic Review, 1996, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 13–132.
14. Im K. S., Pesaran M. H., Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 2003, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 53–74.
15. Knack S., Keefer P. Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 1995, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 207–227.
16. Milgrom P., North D. C., Weingast B. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Economics and Politics, 1990, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–23.
17. Nelson R. R. The co-evolution of technology. Industrial structure and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1994, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–63.
18. North D. C. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. The Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990. VIII, 152 p.
19. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990. XVIII, 280 p.
20. Schotter A. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press, 1981. XIII, 192 p.
21. Sims C. A. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 1980, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–48.
22. Sugden R. Spontaneous order. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 85–97.
2. Bowles S. Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution. New York, Russell Sage foundation; Princeton: Princeton university press, 2006. 584 p.
3. Butkiewicz J. L., Yanikkaya H. Institutional quality and economic growth: Maintenance of the rule of law or democratic institutions, or both? Economic Modelling, 2006, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 648–661.
4. Chamberlain G. Panel Data. Handbook of Econometrics ed. by Z. Griliches, M. Intrilligator. Vol. II. Amsterdam, 1983. Pp. 1247–1318.
5. Dias J., Tebaldi E. Institutions, human capital, and growth: The institutional mechanism. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2012, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 300–312.
6. Dumitrescu E.-I., Hurlin C. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 2012, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1450–1460.
7. Gagliardi, F. Institutions and economic change: A critical survey of the new institutional approaches and empirical evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics, 2008, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 416–443.
8. Glaeser E. L., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 2004, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 271–303.
9. Greif A. Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: evidence on the Maghribi traders. Journal of Economic History, 1989, vol. 49, № 4, pp. 857–882.
10. Greif A. Historical and comparative institutional analysis. American Economic Review, 1998, vol. 88, № 2, pp. 80–84.
11. Holtz-Eakin D., Newey W., Rosen H. S. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel. Econometrica, 1988, vol. 56, № 6, pp. 1371–1395.
12. Hood M. V., Kidd Q., Morris I. L. Two sides of the same coin? Employing Granger causality tests in a time series cross-section framework. Political Analysis. — 2008, vol. 16, pp. 324–344.
13. Hurwicz L. Institutions as families of game form. Japanese Economic Review, 1996, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 13–132.
14. Im K. S., Pesaran M. H., Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 2003, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 53–74.
15. Knack S., Keefer P. Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 1995, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 207–227.
16. Milgrom P., North D. C., Weingast B. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Economics and Politics, 1990, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–23.
17. Nelson R. R. The co-evolution of technology. Industrial structure and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1994, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–63.
18. North D. C. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. The Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990. VIII, 152 p.
19. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990. XVIII, 280 p.
20. Schotter A. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press, 1981. XIII, 192 p.
21. Sims C. A. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 1980, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–48.
22. Sugden R. Spontaneous order. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 85–97.
Опубликована
2022-10-06
Как цитировать
ЗАХАРОВА, Евгения Александровна et al.
МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ВЛИЯНИЯ ИНСТИТУТОВ НА ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЙ РОСТ РЕГИОНОВ.
Общество, экономика, управление, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 4, p. 13-19, oct. 2022.
ISSN 2618-9852. Доступно на: <https://journals.csu.ru/index.php/management/article/view/1599>. Дата доступа: 08 sep. 2024
Выпуск
Раздел
Государственное и муниципальное управление
Ключевые слова
институты
панельная векторная авторегрессия
экономический рост
причинность Грейнджера на основе панельных данных
