OTHERNESS AS A PARAMETER OF COMMUNICATIVE INTERACTION
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify the linguistic means of expressing the implicit category of otherness as a communicative parameter. The main methods of research are: descriptive, taxonomic, contextual and discursive analyses. Linguistic means of alterity as a parameter of real and fictional communication and their ecolinguistic impact are identified. The research results contribute to ecolinguistics, cognitive linguistics and theory of communication
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Golovanova EI, Madzhaeva SI. On the vocabulary of the coronavirus pandemic epoch. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2020;(7):48-57. DOI:
10.47475/1994-2796-2020-10707. (In Russ.).
2. Kameneva VA, Rabkina NV. Functional potential of the discourse of political meetings. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2021;(4 Philological Sciences Iss. 124):57‑64. (In Russ.).
3. Kislyakova EYu. Kommunikativnaya kategoriya inakosti = The communicative category of otherness.
Volgograd; 2018. 250 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kislyakova EYu. The category of alterity via communicative strategies and tactics. Vestnik Moskovskogo
gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika = Bulletin of Moscow Region State University.
Series: Linguistics. 2018;(1):8-17. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X‑2018-1-8-17. (In Russ.).
5. Malakhov VS. Paradoxes of multiculturalism. Inostrannaya literaturа = Foreign literature. 1997;(11):171‑174.
(In Russ.).
6. Madzhaeva SI. Specificity of medical terms in medical discourse. Nauchnii resultat. Ser. Voprosi teoretichescoi i pricladnoi lingvistiki = Scientific result. Series: Problems of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics.
2015;(3(5):28-32. (In Russ.).
7. Mat’yash OI. Iazyk v mezhlichnostnoy kommunikatcii = Language in interpersonal communication.
In: Mezhlichnostnaya kommunikatsiya: teoriya i zhizn’ = Interpersonal communication: theory and life. St. Petersburg: Rech Publ.; 2011. Pp. 211—273. (In Russ.).
8. Nesterova YaA, Chernukha TV. Term and terminology. Political vocabulary. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki = Science Journal of Tula State University. Humanities. 2008;(2):226‑236. (In Russ.).
9. Polovtsev DO. Inakovost’ kak filosofsko-literaturnaya kategoriya = Otherness as a philosophical and literary
category. Available from: https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/111206 (accessed 22.11.2020). (In Russ.).
10. Sternin IA. Tolerantnost’ i kommunikatciia = Tolerance and communication. In: Filosofskie i lingvokul’turologicheskie problemy tolerantnosti = Philosophical and linguoculturological problems of tolerance. Ekaterinburg,
Ural University Publ.; 2003. Pp. 331—344. (In Russ.).
11. Takhtarova SS. Communicative categories in the cognitive-discursive paradigm. Vestnik Volgogradskogo
gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Yazykoznanie = Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 2017;(16-2):189-196. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2017.2.21. (In Russ.).
12. Shakhovskii VI. Dissonans ekologichnosti v kommunikativnom kruge: chelovek, yazyk, emotsii = Dissonance of environmental friendliness in the communicative circle: person, language, emotions. Volgograd;
2016. 504 p. (In Russ.).
13. Britton JH Sermon. Beneath the Cross of Jesus: Finding the Other. Anglican Theological Review.
2004;(86‑4):567-571.
10.47475/1994-2796-2020-10707. (In Russ.).
2. Kameneva VA, Rabkina NV. Functional potential of the discourse of political meetings. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2021;(4 Philological Sciences Iss. 124):57‑64. (In Russ.).
3. Kislyakova EYu. Kommunikativnaya kategoriya inakosti = The communicative category of otherness.
Volgograd; 2018. 250 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kislyakova EYu. The category of alterity via communicative strategies and tactics. Vestnik Moskovskogo
gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika = Bulletin of Moscow Region State University.
Series: Linguistics. 2018;(1):8-17. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X‑2018-1-8-17. (In Russ.).
5. Malakhov VS. Paradoxes of multiculturalism. Inostrannaya literaturа = Foreign literature. 1997;(11):171‑174.
(In Russ.).
6. Madzhaeva SI. Specificity of medical terms in medical discourse. Nauchnii resultat. Ser. Voprosi teoretichescoi i pricladnoi lingvistiki = Scientific result. Series: Problems of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics.
2015;(3(5):28-32. (In Russ.).
7. Mat’yash OI. Iazyk v mezhlichnostnoy kommunikatcii = Language in interpersonal communication.
In: Mezhlichnostnaya kommunikatsiya: teoriya i zhizn’ = Interpersonal communication: theory and life. St. Petersburg: Rech Publ.; 2011. Pp. 211—273. (In Russ.).
8. Nesterova YaA, Chernukha TV. Term and terminology. Political vocabulary. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki = Science Journal of Tula State University. Humanities. 2008;(2):226‑236. (In Russ.).
9. Polovtsev DO. Inakovost’ kak filosofsko-literaturnaya kategoriya = Otherness as a philosophical and literary
category. Available from: https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/111206 (accessed 22.11.2020). (In Russ.).
10. Sternin IA. Tolerantnost’ i kommunikatciia = Tolerance and communication. In: Filosofskie i lingvokul’turologicheskie problemy tolerantnosti = Philosophical and linguoculturological problems of tolerance. Ekaterinburg,
Ural University Publ.; 2003. Pp. 331—344. (In Russ.).
11. Takhtarova SS. Communicative categories in the cognitive-discursive paradigm. Vestnik Volgogradskogo
gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Yazykoznanie = Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 2017;(16-2):189-196. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2017.2.21. (In Russ.).
12. Shakhovskii VI. Dissonans ekologichnosti v kommunikativnom kruge: chelovek, yazyk, emotsii = Dissonance of environmental friendliness in the communicative circle: person, language, emotions. Volgograd;
2016. 504 p. (In Russ.).
13. Britton JH Sermon. Beneath the Cross of Jesus: Finding the Other. Anglican Theological Review.
2004;(86‑4):567-571.
Published
2022-05-08
How to Cite
КИСЛЯКОВА, Евгения Юрьевна; МАДЖАЕВА, Санья Ибрагимовна; КАСИМЦЕВА, Любовь Михайловна.
OTHERNESS AS A PARAMETER OF COMMUNICATIVE INTERACTION.
Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, [S.l.], n. 3(461), p. 79-84, may 2022.
ISSN 2782-4829.
Available at: <https://journals.csu.ru/index.php/BulletinCSU/article/view/1113>. Date accessed: 19 may 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2022-10311.
Section
Статьи
Keywords
alterity, implicit category, communicative parameter, linguistic manifestation of alterity, textual manifestation of alterity, (non)ecological impact of alterity
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Екатерина Алексеевна Абросимова, Санья Ибрагимовна Маджаева, NOMINATION OF THE SUBJECT OF VETERINARY DISCOURSE: SEMANTIC FEATURES AND TRENDS OF FORMATION , Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University: No 5(475) (2023): Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University
